Universal health care seems to be a hot topic when the health care reform is debated in the U.S..
Those who claim that health do not want an individual responsibility, that a system that they contribute tax money to citizens who are not responsible for protecting and promoting their own health requires active support. They argue that they want the freedom to choose their own doctors and treatments, and suggest thatGovernment can not know what's good for them. These people argue that preserving the current system offers improvements for better insurance protection for the citizen who is not insured or remain within the health care needs of their policyholders, the only reform that is necessary.
Those who believe health care is an individual right to support a universal health care, arguing that every citizen deserves to have access to proper care at the right time to have, and that aGovernment's responsibility to its citizens, sometimes even protect themselves.
Two opposing arguments of two conflicting ideologies. Both are good arguments, but neither can be an argument for supporting the implementation or rejection of universal health care. The matter must be resolved by an ethical framework.
Require the examination of ethical issues in health care reform would be much heed to arguments other than those alreadypresented. Ethical questions would center on the moral law. Discussion would not begin, "what is best for me?" but "How we should act as a society, so that our actions are morally right?"
Ethics refers to the determination of right and wrong, how people are interrelated. Ethical decision making for health care reform would then have the people in regard to our relations with the rest of us not themselves act singleInterests.
Analysis of part of the common ethical decision-making theories can provide a basis for a different perspective than one that relates exclusively to individual rights and freedoms.
Ethical decision making requires that certain questions must be answered to decide the activities to be, whether good or morally right. Here are some questions that could be used in ethical decision making for health care reform.
What measures will bringthe most good to the people?
What measures in and of itself is a good deed and helping us to fulfill our duties, obligations and responsibilities to each other?
What measures in and of itself shows care and concern for all citizens?
As the answer to all these questions, a general health care can always do as the right thing.
The United States is in the best position there when it comes to health reform. They are the only developed countries without a national health care system in place for all citizens. You have the option from the mistakes that have from all other countries that have already gone the road learn about universal health care. You have the option of a system that shone like a jewel in the crown of universal health care systems everywhere can design.
However, all the ethical decision-making is structured around values. In order for universalBe assumed> healthcare for all citizens in the United States, they are compatible only with the collective value of justice and fairness and the objective of carrying out their collective responsibility to each other's arms, while respecting individual rights and freedoms. This seems to prove the most difficult of all obstacles.
Recommend : Free play game boots shoes PROM DRESSES health care benefits
No comments:
Post a Comment